|
Issue 18, 3/4/04
Contents:
Aimee Betz, Fulbright Scholar
The
Power of BEADS
Ancestry
Informative Markers
Brose
Distinguished Lecture Series
Do you Know?
Emily
Grosholz
Contact
Us
Unsubscribe
Subscribe
Penn
State
College
of the Liberal Arts
Alumni
Relations and Development
|
Q&A
WITH JUDGE CYNTHIA BALDWIN
Judge
Cynthia Baldwin '66 English, '74 M.A.
English is
the first African-American woman to chair Penn
State’s Board
of Trustees. She was also the first African-American female judge
to be elected to the Allegheny
County
Court of Common
Pleas. After Penn State, she attended Duquesne University
School of Law to pursue
a Juris Doctorate degree. For over thirteen years Judge Baldwin
has been an active member of the Penn
State Alumni Association.
She also
is a former President of the Association.
In 1995, she was awarded the Penn State Distinguished Alumni Award.
What is a typical day for you as a judge?
The
most exciting factor about my judicial career is that there is no typical
day. That is not to say that there are no repetitions. After
all, I've been on the bench for fourteen years, during the course of
which l have served in the Adult Family Division, the Juvenile Division,
and
the Civil Division. I am also the Decertification Judge. My duty in that
position is to decide whether a person under the age of 18 years will
be tried as an adult or a juvenile. Recently, I have also been asked
to do some statutory appeals involving HUD Section 8 housing. This month
I'm serving as Motions Judge. l hear motions on cases as varied as mortgage
foreclosure and preliminary injunctions in commercial matters, among
others.
What’s
the most challenging and/or interesting aspect of your career?
The
most challenging aspect of my career is to care about the people and
cases
before me, listen carefully to the cases, and make decisions
in the cases, but not to carry any case home with me. If a Judge is still
mulling over yesterday's cases, he/she will not be giving the next litigants
his/her full attention.
What do you see as the role of the Board of Trustees as an entity? Your
role?
The
Board of Trustees has many weighty matters that come before it. It
is imperative that we balance the cost of education for the students
against keeping Pent State a premier land grant university with top-notch
faculty and teaching, outstanding curricula, important and relevant research,
and facilities with cutting edge technology. Truly no student is attracted
to a university that has only reasonable prices without the rest. One
of my roles is to keep the Board focused on the issues that come before
us and to ensure that we use the diversity of ideas articulated by the
Board members to the University's best advantage.
How
do you envision Penn State evolving over the next ten years?
It
is truly difficult to envision Penn State's evolution over the next
ten years,
but I know it will be exciting. Who would have thought ten years
ago that our education delivery systems would be so different and that
it would be possible for a student to attain a Penn State education without
ever seeing any of our campuses? How does the University keep those alumni
tied into its mission and spirit? Who would have envisioned an IST building
straddling Atherton Street with classrooms resembling Star Wars rocket
ships? Our library system allows our students to access books and materials
from anywhere in the world within a few days.
How
has your education at Penn State affected your professional (and
personal) development?
The value placed on my Penn State education has made me a committed
volunteer for Penn State. Not only did I get a great undergraduate education,
but also I learned life skills from my interactions with faculty counselors
and alumni.
What
advice can you give to undergraduate students about how to face the
challenges of life in the “real” world?
My
advice to undergraduates is to take full advantage of all of the opportunities
Penn State affords you, both in the classroom and in activities
outside of the classroom. Be involved in student government, clubs,
and study abroad, among others so that your horizons are broadened.
Back
to top
AIMEE
BETZ, FULBRIGHT SCHOLAR, REFLECTS ON HER EXPERIENCE
When
I decided to come to Korea, I don’t think I really understood
what to expect. I’m in a country that every day I see how it
is developing, not only physically as I reside in Mokpo (a city far
behind Seoul standards), but also from talking to the people. My
teachers are wonderful and provide me with a great deal of insight.
I’ve
caught myself becoming very Korean; no longer do I think twice about
taking my shoes off when I enter a house, restaurant or school;
I’ve
become accustomed to using two hands to politely conduct exchanges;
I bow even to other foreigners; it seems normal to use scissors to
cut meat; I am no longer confused when a Korean motions for me to
come to them
using a signal that all my life I’ve known to mean “get away;” no
longer do I cringe at the unsanitary cleaning methods that occur when
students are in charge of cleaning their school—and I’ve even
adjusted to having to teach in a classroom with drastic variations
in English/learning
levels; some of my classes even have special students (this is how
my students refer to mentally challenged students in my classroom).
These
are just some of the things that, in the beginning, caused me to constantly
notice the
differences I needed to adjust myself to. Things
still shock me: being told to wear a seatbelt on a bus but getting a
look of being insulting for putting it on in a car (luckily not from
my host mom); being stopped on a Monday afternoon
on a desolate road for a breathalyzer test; finally getting into a routine
only to discover
that stores like the post office change their hours whenever they feel
like it. My family seems to sense when I’m homesick or experiencing
culture shock; they always plan family fun time on just the right days.
For
as much as I've written, I feel like I’m unable
to adequately explain my experience here.
Back
to top
THE
POWER OF BEADS
This month, Debby Rooney ’70 German
will once again travel to Kenya to work with young women on behalf of BEADS
for Education, the
charitable
organization she founded to enhance the status of women in their communities
and to promote environmental awareness with a goal of preserving natural
resources.
She might talk to a 14-year-old Maasai girl whose
beaded key chains are keeping her in school. She might talk with teachers
at the Dupotu
Women’s Group about progress at the school BEADS helped establish
in 1993. She might interact with supportive government officials about
ways to increase BEADS's effects.
Her itinerary will be filled with appointments, and the visit will continue
her decade of work, helping her make BEADS self-perpetuating.
“This
is an amazing, life changing program,” she says. “BEADS
basically helps support women’s businesses while sponsoring the
education of girls in Kenya so they don’t get married at 13.”
According
to Rooney, girls without an education in Kenya can expect to be forced
into an arranged marriage to an older man, possibly as a
second or third wife, and to bear seven or more children in her lifetime.
However, if a girl receives an education, she will likely marry a man
of her choice, have fewer children, improve the standard of living for
her family, educate her children, have greater self-esteem, and make
a positive impact on the environment by choosing to live a more sustainable
lifestyle.
To achieve such a difference costs roughly US$30 per month per girl.
The reason more Kenyan girls are not educated is that the average monthly
income for a family in Kenya is US$25.
For
the first several years, Rooney orchestrated the program to support fifteen
girls. Two years ago, with a change in government in Kenya and
greater support from advisors and other contacts in the United States,
the group grew to its current size, supporting the education of ninety-seven
girls. Currently, the mothers of girls supported by BEADS craft beaded
products
which are then sold. All of the proceeds, 100 percent, come back to support
the girls. Beyond the craftwork itself, a core of women who have been
supported by the program take part in community service and a variety
of workshops: career counseling, AIDS training counseling, human rights
awareness, and more.
Now, with a Web presence and national press coverage in places like
Ms., Elle Magazine, African Wildlife News, and dozens of newspapers,
BEADS is attracting donors who make outright sponsorship commitments,
pledging the US$30 monthly it takes to support the girls.
“This year, we have seen a very widespread influence,” Rooney
says. “Three girls started college who had been in the program
for several years. They hope to work for the organization afterward.
With their commitment and their success, I expect BEADS will become self-perpetuating.”
BEADS
has come a long way, as has Rooney herself. Before she knew she wanted
to help people, she worked to save animals. A twenty-year veteran
environmental educator, Rooney had traveled to Kenya in hopes of saving
endangered and mistreated animals. She soon realized she wanted to help
the people she met and talked about in her classes.
Before
BEADS, she had worked at an aquarium and in other environmental activist
capacities.
But, she says, “My education at Penn State
really set me up to do what I am doing. I was a German major, and I took
my teacher credits, expecting to work in a school. I didn’t realize
how important languages would be. I’ve learned some Swahili, and
some bits of other east African languages, but you can get around the
world on German.”
Back
to top
WHAT
IS AN ANCESTRY INFORMATIVE MARKER?
Geneticist
Mark Shriver, assistant professor of biological
anthropology, performs
what might
be thought of as DNA macro-analysis. Shriver’s technique
considers DNA samples from large numbers of people, looking at the broadest
trends and “markers” (specific positions where there are
sequence differences) which have taken thousands of years to develop.
“Much of the human genome is very similar,” Shriver says. “So
if you analyze several samples at once, and most of it looks very similar,
those places that have differences show up dramatically.”
Such markers
can often correlate with disease, but can just as often signify a difference
in an expressed trait, or be of no consequence whatsoever.
An expressed trait, or “phenotype,” might be an aspect of
physical appearance, the likelihood of contracting a disease, or any
result of a genetic code as it manifests itself in an individual and
is effected by environment.
Scientists
agree that the human genome looks the way it does today due to its evolution
over thousands of years of natural selection, mutation,
migration, and random drift (for a definition of random drift, click
here).
People interact and reproduce, and certain traits endure in the species
while others disappear.
But
because large groups of individuals were isolated by various factors—mainly
geological barriers—off and on over the history of human evolution,
there are some rare markers that have persevered in their gene pools.
The “allele frequencies” (click
here for a definition) within
the markers reveal the populations’ geographic origins. Generally,
allele frequencies are quite similar across all human populations, reflecting
our very recent common origin.
Shriver’s
work, termed admixture mapping, looks at the changes in genetic profiles
that have resulted as large populations came in contact
with one another. For instance, when people of West Africa—which
includes several different groups—came in contact with groups comprised
of what we think of today as Europeans and American Indians, resulting
offspring carried markers from each group.
What does such work tell us? Shriver's lab works on applications of
population genetics to questions of human origins and human evolution.
Which groups moved where and when? How did they interact, genetically?
Shriver focuses particularly on normal and disease phenotypes that may
have been subject to recent (last several thousand years) active natural
selection. These phenotypes include chronic diseases such as obesity,
diabetes, and hypertension, and normal variation in common traits, namely
skin and hair pigmentation, tooth features, and stature.
One interesting
point Shriver makes resulting from his work is that there is no typological
basis for race. That is, no common characteristics
allow for biological classification of race. He explains, “Human
populations are too closely related to be considered subspecies. The
surface appearance differences are too superficial to constitute such
categorization. There are no ‘pure’ human stocks and never
were.”
Rather,
Shriver points out that race as generally understood and as used in
biomedical research
refers to cultural, social, and biological
features of population groups. The designation suggests greater human
variation than actually exists biologically. Although much genetic variation
is shared among all human populations, only about 5 percent of such markers
can be considered “Ancestry Informative Markers.”The results
suggest what is supported by the movement of people over time: ancestry
is a tricky matter.
“It is simplistic to equate skin color and race,” Shriver
says. “There are both dark and light skinned populations in most
parts of the world and extensive variation in pigmentation within most
regions.”
Even so,
because Shriver’s work has pinpointed ancestry informative
markers, or AIMs, the science can be used for things other than population
genetics. For instance, Shriver’s research attracted national press
coverage in June 2003, when the New York Times reported that his techniques
had been used to alter a police investigation, revealing a murder suspect
to be a black man, rather than a white man, as profilers had deduced.
The technique
is also being used to allow individuals to learn their ancestry mix.
A
consulting business employs the technique to provide
the test. People who are thought of culturally as “white,” through
such a test might find, for instance, that their AIMs reveal them to
be 80 percent European ancestry, 12 percent West African, and 8 percent
American Indian.
Shriver
points out that many Americans will find their ancestry to be comprised
of many different peoples, with roots around the world, and
that ancestry suggests much more complexity than do cultural labels
such as white or black or Native American.
Back
to top
BROSE
DISTINGUISHED LECTURE SERIES WELCOMES BACK GARY GALLAGHER
Five
years ago, Professor Gary Gallagher left Penn State for the University
of Virginia, but not before setting in motion events that would lead
to the establishment of the George
and Ann Richards Civil War Era Center.
This
April, Gallagher, now the John L. Nau III Professor of the History of the
American Civil War at the University of Virginia, will deliver
three lectures for the 2004 Steven and Janice Brose Distinguished Lecture
and Book Series in the Civil War Era Center. Held every spring semester,
the Brose Lectures feature leading writers, historians, and intellectuals
whose
work focuses on the era of the American Civil War.
This year’s series occurs on April 1, 2, and 3, in Pattee Library’s
Foster Auditorium on Penn State’s University Park campus. All the
lectures are free and open to the public.
Professor
Gallagher’s
Brose Lectures will explore what recent popular culture tells us about
how Americans see the Civil War. He will
discuss the respective causes of the United States and the Confederacy
as reflected in film and art, identifying long-term winners and losers
and speculating about why more violence has been done to some parts of
the historical record than to others.
The three lectures will deal with distinct aspects of Gallagher’s
overriding theme. The schedule is as follows:
—Thursday, April 1, 7 p.m.: “The
True Lost Cause: Hollywood and the Elusive War for Union.”
—Friday,
April 2, 7 p.m.: “God,
Generals, Guerillas, and Civilians: The Confederate War on Film.”
—Saturday, April 3, 3 p.m.: “Brushes,
Canvases, and the Image of War: The
Ascendancy of Confederate Themes in Recent Civil War Art.”
Gary Gallagher is the author or editor of two-dozen
books on the Civil War, of which half have been History Book Club selections.
Recent titles
include Lee and His Army in Confederate History, The American
Civil War: The War in the East 1861–May 1863, Lee and
His Generals in War and Memory, and The Confederate War. His numerous
awards and fellowships
include a Times-Mirror Foundation Distinguished Fellowship at The Huntington
Library in 2001–2002, and the Fletcher Pratt Award, for best non-fiction
book on the Civil War, in 1998, for Lee and His Generals in War and
Memory.
Gallagher frequently lectures on the Civil War at universities as well
as for general audiences and is currently the editor of the University
of North Carolina Press’s “Civil War America” series
(forty titles to date) and “Military Campaigns of the Civil War” series
(eight titles).
The
Steven and Janice Brose Distinguished Lecture and Book Series in the Civil
War Era Center is supported
by an endowment established by the Broses
in 1998, originally to support a single lecture by a distinguished visitor.
The Broses added to the endowment in 2001, allowing a distinguished
lecturer to deliver three related lectures over three days. The Brose’s
generosity has enabled Penn State and the Richards Center to enter an
agreement with the University of Virginia Press, which will publish the
lectures as part of a series of scholarly monographs.
Back
to top
DO
YOU KNOW?
In
our last issue, we mentioned that the dean’s suite of offices,
in Sparks Building, underwent a renovation, and the upgrade included
placing a quotation on prominent display. We asked readers which of
the following quotations was chosen to adorn the wall outside the dean’s
office?
a) “They know enough who know how to learn.”—Henry
Adams.
b) “A mind is a fire to be kindled, not a vessel to be filled.”—Plutarch.
c) “Instruction enlarges the natural powers of the mind.”—Horace.
d) “I have never let my schooling interfere with my education.”
— Mark Twain. The correct answer is b. Robert Yuskavage answered correctly, bringing
his total number of correct trivia answers to 3.
For this issue, our question is inspired by Professor Grosholz (see article
below). The College of the Liberal Arts has lately earned notable support
from
the
National
Endowment for the Humanities. Our question this time is perhaps one of
our tougher ones, so we might foil the diabolical trivia ability of Mr.
Yuskavage: how many other faculty in Liberal Arts have earned NEH support
this year?
We look forward to your responses. Good luck.
Back
to top
EMILY
GROSHOLZ
Her
office in Sparks is filled with bookshelves containing philosophy by
Descartes, Kant, The Aeneid, A History of Western Philosophy,
novels written in French, stacks of spiral notebooks, and literary
journals such as The
Hudson Review. The range of books illuminates Penn State philosophy
professor Emily
Grosholz’s vast academic and personal interests.
She writes poetry, studies theories of both philosophy and mathematics,
and is a scholar of African American Studies.
Recently, her work has
been recognized through a Fellowship from the National Endowment of the
Humanities. The NEH grant will allow Grosholz to finish the draft of
her latest book project, Analysis, History, and Intelligibility:
An Essay in the Philosophy of Mathematics. The book examines a shift
in the philosophy of mathematics that began in the early 20th century
with French scientist-philosophers
Henri
Poincaré and Pierre
Duhem, who were critical of the logicism
of Bertrand Russell. It will continue arguments she makes in Reduction
and Representation, the book she is currently completing, which
examines the role of different modes of representation in mathematics
and chemistry;
it was begun while she was a Visiting Fellow at the University of Cambridge.
She will finish her newest book in Paris where she has colleagues who “have
been some of my best interlocutors over the past two decades.”
During her career, Grosholz has co-authored and co-edited several books,
including The Grown of Mathematical Knowledge, Leibniz’s Science
of the Rational, and W. E. B. DuBois on Race and Culture: Philosophy,
Politics and Poetics. In addition, she has published four collections
of poetry. One of her poems, “Theories of Vision,” was just
reprinted in The Mathematical Intelligencer, which is like Scientific
American for mathematicians. Her edited volume, The Legacy of
Simone de Beauvoir, was released this January by Oxford University Press.
A poet and a philosopher, Grosholz describes her attraction to the philosophy
of mathematics with an analogy. “I have always loved mathematics.
It’s very beautiful, and part of the genius of the human spirit,
like poetry.”
Back
to top
|